11 Replies on “Quoting myself…

  1. You need to explain your monocausalist theory in more depth Chechar. To blame so called Christian universalism as the cause of all White problems is monocausalist itself, isn’t it?

    Like so called White Nationalists who hate Christianity, or xtianity as they like to diminish it, because Christianity is a Jewish religion, as they put it. But doesn’t that argument come back to the same mono-cause, i.e. the Jews?

    In blaming Christian universalism for all our woes you would need to consider examples of historic Christian nations which were mono-ethnic. Example, Christian Australia right up to the 70s which had a racially exclusive policy, the White Australia policy. If Christian universalism was so fundamentalist as you see it, that it saw equality in all races and ethnicities, how was it that the Christians who formulated the nation Oz in law, also formulated policies that ensured it remain White?

    We didn’t have a black problem like the U.S.A. because it was our policy that any non-White labour we brought in, could only remain temporarily. These Kanaks, as they were called, had to return to the Pacific nations from whence they came after their work was done.

    But this all changed in the 70s. Why? Did Christian universalism suddenly turn on its head?

    This sudden focus on “monocausalism” is a Leftist and Jewish trick. Like “racism”, it’s a word game to put us on the defensive. One of Saul Alinksy’s strategies was to use his enemies principles against them. Could it possibly be that so called Christian universalism, which was never espoused in the current modern format, was used against White Christians to undermine them? I think so, and the evidence stacks up in my favour.

    Who promulgates this Universalism of equality today? Why, it’s the U.S.A. whose strand of Christianity bears very little resemblance to the traditional Christianity of Europe, out of which it came, and mutated in that particular Judeo-American milieu.

    You want a mono-cause? Then look to those who promulgate this universalism. You will find it in the one and only world super power, who determines what we think, what we can and can’t do. You will find its propaganda in the media mills of that nation. Do Christians own and run the media mills of Judeo-America Chechar?

    You know they don’t. And you know that the Judeo-Americans own and run their evil media mills.

    I think you need to rethink this theory of yours before you turn into the very same people who currently wage war on Whites. Just because Americans are blinded to their inversion of all White tradition doesn’t cause you to follow down the same dark path.

    1. “Christian nations which were mono-ethnic”

      Should be “Christian nations which were mono-racial”. Oz was multi-ethnic, but mon-racial under the White Australia Policy.

      Ethnicities: Welsh, Scots, English, Irish, German being the dominant ethnicities, not in order. Dominant ethnicity was English, though expressed as British.

      Race: White. As defined by our national founders.

      Federation modeled on Swiss canton system.

      I hope Andrew Fraser addresses the White Australia Policy in one of his essays. It is a real world example where White was defined, not in the negative as Fraser keeps deriding the term “White” in White Nationalism, but exclusive and inclusive.

      White is an umbrella term for all White ethnicities to unite under, without diminishing our ethnic allegiances. But their is a higher allegiance which is vital now to our survival, and that is White.

      Of course I identify more with my Irish roots. Especially now that what was White Australia, where I was ethnically incorporated as Australian, is now inverted to mean anyone holding residency or citizenship papers.

      But that doesn’t mean I do not identify a common cause with the English, for example. Quite the opposite. I do identify a common cause. If there is a WASP problem, which I agree with Fraser that there is, the problem is that the WASPs are an all or nothing people. It must be all English, or nothing. They chose nothing, and let in the hordes of non-Whites instead of amalgamating and finding common cause with their fellow Whites.

      Mono-cause = Jews? No, of course not. It includes the more Jewish than the Jews WASP problem. As well as many others, like anti-xtian atheists who want to throw out the baby with the bathwater.

    2. You need to explain your monocausalist theory

      I am not a monocausalist. At Occidental Dissent for example, they have challenged what they call the “single-cause hypothesis” (= monocausalism): the provincial belief that Jews are the single etiology of our problems. The way they challenge it at Occidental Dissent is simply by showing an America immersed in a runaway capitalism completely inimical to their ethnic interests, a system that predated the rise of the Jews in the US.

      To blame so-called Christian universalism as the cause of all White problems is monocausalist itself, isn’t it?

      As I said I am not a monocausalist. I just mentioned capitalism, one of the main factors of a genocidal system. There are other factors. Behind Christian—and “Secular Christian” (i.e., liberalism)—values, there are problems within the white psyche. As I said elsewhere, apparently Kevin MacDonald is writing a whole book on the subject. Meanwhile just listen to what Guessedworker said during an interview and have a glimpse of a profound analysis of the basic etiology of Western malaise, something that predates even Christianity.

      This sudden focus on “monocausalism” is a Leftist and Jewish trick.

      What do you mean? If you read the 15 articles I collected here you will see that, in addition to Guessedworker, other nationalists have been challenging the single-cause hypothesis, which by the way a monocausalist commenter recently put it this way: “There is NOTHING wrong with us”.

      Nothing wrong with us? That’s why monocausalists abhor expressions such as “We are doing it ourselves”. But only those who don’t want to see the truly dark side of the original, IV and V centuries Christianity—see e.g., articles 7-13 of my list—cannot fathom that there’s something incredibly wrong within us.

      You want a mono-cause? Then look to those who promulgate this universalism. You will find it in the one and only world super power

      As we have already discussed elsewhere, even sans Jews, within the domains of the world superpower known as Spain and New Spain in the 16th-18th centuries, the universalist Spaniards almost completely ruined their gene pool by massive mestization (I consider myself a rare survivor of such astronomical destruction of our genetic heritage in this part of the continent). This fact alone refutes “monocausalism”.

      I think you need to rethink this theory of yours

      Again, challenging monocausalism it is not a theory of mine. Most of my fifteen collected pieces are authored by other guys, and my original thoughts on how Secular Christianity has undermined the white race (entries #3 and #5) are afterthoughts of what those guys have theorized before me.

      If you see the right margin of this blog, under the section “Who am I?” you will see that after the introductory posts I only included two pieces of what arguably may be called my original research. These two long pieces have nothing to do with challenging monocausalism. Instead, my thinking there revolves around Psychohistory and my pagan views about classical Eros vis-à-vis the disgusting degeneracy we see today in the so-called “gay” world.

      1. Ok, I will read these articles later. I have also downloaded Guessedworker’s interview with Linder for listening later. As it is, even if the challenge to so called mono-causalist theory isn’t yours, you are a proponent of it.

        I don’t place value in Occidental Dissent. Wallace is a typical Judeo-Yank who ran away from our cause, and now taken up with the BRA movement. I ask, if Blacks Run America, then how did they manage that, given that we all agree that they’re too stupid and wild on the whole to achieve anything, let alone running America.

        But the BRA is a mono-causalist movement. The Blacks did it. And if they search for blame, whatever *you* do, don’t blame the Jews, don’t blame anyone, except us! Yes, blame Whites for BRA.

        Yanks are interferers, moral crusaders, seekers of specks in other’s eyes. Why don’t these Yanks just stfu and fix their own God damned country hey? It used to be that America was isolationist, and built her wealth and independence on that foundational principle: of minding your own business.

        So when did that change? Wilson wasn’t it? Wilson was a Presbyterian, was it his Christian universalism that made him such a botherer of other nations? Why did the Yanks have to keep on interfering in Europe’s wars? Why does the U.S.A. now have an official policy of democracy for all? Blame the Christians for that while at the very same time, the American’s have driven that very Christian religion from all her institutions. And who did that? Was it Christians? Did Christians demand that their religion be driven out of their schools? Did Christians hoist a menorrah on the White House lawn?

        You know that Jews were the driving force for many of these nationally destructive policies foisted on the U.S.A. and now form the centrepiece of her foreign policy.

      2. Monocausalism is like obliquely saying that capitalism, Christianity & Secular Christianity and even bad parenting (my take on the subject here) are innocent, and that only Jews must be blamed.

        My blaming of Christian axiology has to do with things such as, say, how timid Germans and Austrians behaved in the 19th century when the Jews were gradually taking over their society. This was long before PC and even before the word “racist” were invented. It infuriated me to see that even Bismarck behaved like a pussycat before the Jews. The deranged sense of decency among most Christians was the culprit.

        I don’t place value in Occidental Dissent. Wallace is a typical Judeo-Yank who ran away from our cause, and now taken up with the BRA movement.

        But I had in mind Wallace before he ran away. See this 2009 article.

  2. Actually, it occurs to me now, discussing the JQ the WASP Q, the White Suicide meme etc, isn’t the more appropriate Question: The American Question, or The American Problem?

    Simply in terms of military, cultural, economic, and religious supremacy, the U.S.A. rules the world and determines our course. So, the best line of questioning, when wanting to understand “Why have Whites been held responsible for all the world’s evil, and blamed for everything, even our own impending genocide?”, is to discuss, “The American Problem”.

    There is a true mono-cause. What is it about America that makes her such a destructive force, focused entirely on White people, and determined to eradicate us.

    Let Linder, Wallace and all the brave Judeo-Yanks discuss that problem, which is a real problem. Consider this suggestion: if the U.S.A. were incinerated overnight due to some cataclysm, what would unfold for the rest of the world’s White population?

    1. We would be free from the yoke of Judeo-American anti-White tyranny, that’s what would happen.

      So, what is it about America that makes her bomb a White nation in Serbia, to supplant a foreign Muslim horde in Europe? And the answer won’t be found in Christianity.

    2. isn’t the more appropriate Question: The American Question, or The American Problem?

      Impossible. As I’ve told you many times the Catholic Spaniards screw up the continent long before the American Empire gained any traction.

      if the U.S.A. were incinerated overnight due to some cataclysm, what would unfold for the rest of the world’s White population?

      Presently the US is the main enemy of the white race. There’s no question about it. That’s why I am so glad that Obama’s fed chairman is printing trillions with no gold backup. Once America’s dollar becomes as valuable as confetti, we white nationalists will have our big chance of jumping for the first time in the train of history.

  3. Quoting myself:

    “The West was buggered by Jesus 1600 years ago and contracted Christianity (HIV), which eventually developed into liberalism (AIDS), which weakens the West’s immune system and opens the door to Jews & company (opportunistic infections), which will cause the West’s death.”

    (sorry about stealing your AIDS analogy)

    1. This is an absolutely perfect metaphor of yours! Hope I’ll quote it in the future—but not with those rednecks now commenting at TOO. They believe that “AIDS” is their salvation, not what it really is: a virus of the mind…

      1. It’s uncanny isn’t it? It really lends credence to Spengler’s belief that civilizations are living organisms.