After more than a year of publishing the original version of this compilation, and my continuing research on the whys of white decline, I have only modified my views about what I wrote in my interim report about the word “racism” on page 29. Thanks to the input of Hadding Scott, Jack Frost and Vance Stubbs on this issue, and a rereading of Nietzsche, I now believe that “racism” is not necessarily Newspeak in the sense of a “control word for whites”—more or less what the Metapedia definition also says. I now see that it’s our Christian-inspired sense morality what spawned an axiological inversion that is destroying whites around the globe. According to Metapedia:
Racism is a term usually only used by critics. Official definitions of racism often state that the term should only be applied on the belief that some races are superior and on negative actions due to this. In practice it is often applied as a form of ad hominem on anyone believing in the existence of races or even on persons advocating restricting immigration, persons criticizing another culture or multiculturalism, persons supporting their own country/ethnicity, etc.
Metapedia is a Christian-friendly online encyclopedia. However, potentially “racism” could be a term mostly used not by our enemies but by us! Had values not been inverted by Christianity and its bastard son, liberalism, racist attitudes would be considered a virtue, as Nietzsche saw:
Christianity, sprung from Jewish roots and comprehensible only as a growth on this soil, represents the counter-movement to any morality of breeding, of race, privilege: it is the anti-Aryan religion par excellence. Christianity—the revaluation of all Aryan values, the victory of chandala values, the gospel preached to the poor and base, the general revolt of all the downtrodden, the wretched, the failures, the less favored, against “race”: the undying chandala hatred is disguised as a religion of love.
I repeat: presently we should see racism as a great virtue, not as a despicable vice.
Umwertung aller Werte!
20 December 126 (Anno Hitleris)
20 December 2015 (Anno Domini)
10 replies on “Foreword to the 2015 edition”
Last August I had posted most of the above text but the subject is important; it merits reposting. The December 2015 edition in printed form is available from Lulu distributors, here.
The west lived under christian theocracy for centuries while staying white. The west only ceased defending itself properly after the French Revolution brought about a secular order that allowed for psychiatry to play a more prominent role in society.
I would have to say psychiatry and the mental health system is primarily why whites are more docile than 3rd world races.
I agree that perhaps christianity has been a bad influence on the west but I dont think it is as big a culprit as psychiatry.
You’re wrong there. While it’s true that psychiatry is an extremely monstrous pseudoscience (I have a blog on this subject in Spanish), way before the French Revolution the Christians ruined their gene pool in Constantinople and in Latin America. They did not stay whites as you claim above.
I’d recommend your reading the above book, FRDH, before commenting here again (PDF linked on the sidebar if you cannot afford a hard copy).
I think the whole drug and alcohol recovery system is a state religion. It’s all based on the twelve steps. I was in it for six years which was many decades ago. I didn’t start to get better until I left all that garbage. The point is that here you have Bill Wilson’s spiritual principles funded by state agencies as the only successful “cure”.
Many Germanic men and European men have no sense of REAL identity. Their identity is based on banging as many women as possible, dominating other people, drinking to get drunk, smoking, and/or eating meat.
Is it any wonder addiction rates are sky high at present?
The only “cure” to addiction is to get back to tribal ethnic identity.
When a white person is attacked by savages just because their race this horrible event can be understood as ”racism” too.
But racism is a jewish word, essentially. The correct term is ”fundamental injustice”.
I didn’t let the rest of your comment pass through because it seems that you have not read: this.
But why not accept the rest of my comment*
I know, this is quite irrelevant, but shouldn’t it be “Anno Hitleris 125”? Isn’t 1889, the year of the Führer’s birthday, supposed to be year 1? I doubt the start of a year will be set in spring in the next age, so January 1, 1889 will likely be the first day of year 1.
This was posted on December, not before April.