Are monos to blame?

And why beholdest thou the mote that is in the Jude’s eye,
but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

What I said in the previous entry has left me so upset this morning that I have been going around and around in the dining room outside my library that can barely be seen in this photo.
At this time members of my family went to the christening of one of my white cousins who, instead of getting married and reproducing as God intended, adapted a completely Indian baby. The father of that cousin, whiter than me, is one of the most conservatives of the family. But here conservative Catholicism is completely blind to issues of race.
Latin America is gone, but in my desperate pacing in the dining room for what happens in England, I thought that the monocausalists were, in part, responsible for the problem, including a regular commenter of this site (see here), who cannot even see that all the native English who are now cheering the ape wedding are guilty of high treason.
I would define strict monocausalism as the doctrine that preaches on the Internet that Jews are one hundred percent responsible for the Aryan decline, and the latter completely innocent.
It’s a psychotic doctrine, which can only end up in lots of internet sites (see my recent entry that links them all) whining and whining about the latest villainy the Juden did—not daring to move a finger to settle accounts.
On the other hand, for bicausalists like me, who blame the Aryan more for their sins (having embraced the Christian ethics and worshiping Mammon), rather than whining as girls, the natural thing would be to do something. And if direct action is a little premature this very day, as we are broke, at least prepare for war in a legal way. (For example, working hard to save precious metals that will give us more than a thousand percent of purchasing power after the dollar crashes; money to buy guns.)
But the monos don’t do any of that. They just bawl and bawl. By believing that the Jews are responsible for each and every one of our evils, instead of seeing the beam in their own eyes, they just bawl through the length and breadth of the internet because these poor whites are completely innocent!
I’ll be honest: I can no longer read The Daily Stormer and other online newspapers because, after a few months, complaining without doing anything sickens the hell out of me. There are things that cannot be discussed on the internet. Wouldn’t it be good to come together to a place to discuss what we are going to do when the system pops? Why don’t you visit Mexico City as tourists: here there’s is zero antifa because all Iberian whites that remain are castrated. They’re like my cuck relative. What’s the point of continuing to complain if you do nothing?
If white nationalists abandoned their monocausalism to convert to the true religion, Hitlerism, what happened in England and many other places would not hurt us so much. It is obvious that our enemies are going to suffer, and suffer a lot in the not too distant future.
That would boost our morale…

47 Replies on “Are monos to blame?

  1. c.t.,
    please don’t be so hard on arch stanton for his “monoist” arguments. i’ve learned much from both you. your great articles and arch’s good comments expaned my universe and continue to answer my ruminations.
    and it takes time — in my case a decade — to transition out of xtian malware programming into bicausal actions. and there’s a spectrum of actions. in jost turners case, he left civilization and lived in the woods for 5 years with this family . and then he moved on into other actions. none, the revolutionary fantasy. (that one takes synchronicity, and will happen when the time is right. (because there are others beyond our dimension also involved. i’m betting.) and it may not happen in my lifetime.) jost’s essay Revolutionary Fantasys is worth reading.
    occidentaldissent.com/2010/02/21/revolutionary-fantasies
    one of the first actions in waking up to our malware programming that is running in us usually is blaming the jews. even hitler laid much blame at the tribe’s feet.
    my present fantasy? i wish like hell my guardian angel would sit me down for a talk and say, “we’ve chosen you to start the clean up. you’ll be given access to an invisible weapon that none of the dragons or serpents have or will ever have. what they have will be utterly useless against ours. when you use it as directed, it will stop them dead in their tracks. our weapon leaves no trace on their high tech radar trackers. its tracks are invisible to anything presently on earth. and yet, since we can trust you, you will be the initial player in unveiling the program of justice that the pure hearts have long yearned for. and all of us will enjoy the utter fear and terror of the dragons and serpents at knowing they’re time in power is up and all their weapons are useless in defending themselves.”
    until the elites are held accountable to the sovereign individuals by a restoring of balance of power with equitable weapons in the hands of the sovereings, which was lost by ww1 and ww2 spawning for the victors their pursuit of unbounded power via federal funding their military industrial complexes, putting the cost of parity weapons beyond the reach of sovereign individuals, those elites will continue to run unrestrained after evil.

    1. What Arch and the monos don’t want to see is that every adult male Briton who could afford a long-range rifle and missed his opportunity today, is far worse than any kike, or kike action, he mentioned in the previous thread!

      1. I am not sure about the laws concerning guns in Britain, but I think that while it is difficult to get a long range rifle, it is not impossible, and is perfectly legal depending on your permit.

      2. Jack:
        I am going to confess something that I had not said on the internet.
        When I lived in Manchester in 1999, I met a short pardo from Puerto Rico who travelled with an American passport. He used to boast about his adventures to abduct and rape American girls within the US itself; and that sometimes he had to kill them because they were screaming. He fled to the UK to avoid being caught in the US after so many offenses.
        I had a problem in the UK and he even lent me a hundred pounds to purchase my plane ticket. But before that he told me about his plans to rob a jewellery store in London, and I even accompanied him to a secret place in Manchester where real men bought guns.
        I am telling you this just to let you know that even within a single year of experience in your country I met people that are capable to fight like real men, even when this guy deserves immediate termination for what he did with white women.
        This is a world for those who are willing to risk their lives, not for the fags so common in white nationalism. Remember, if whites would be behaving like ISIS instead of complaining about them, the West would be in a much better shape right now.

        1. “This is a world for those who are willing to risk their lives”
          What you say here reminds me of a thought I had recently: “You are either the butcher or the cattle” and “There are the oppressed and those who oppress”.
          Your comment is ironic because, while you speak of some Mestizoid serial killer, the comment makes me optimistic so slightly. To be honest, I have always seen potential in Britons whom rob banks and jewellery stores similar to the “Pardo”. It shows that there are so many Whites who have the potential to be good soldiers but lack any path.
          Who on Earth is going to be attracted to DS and Greggy when you could be having the time of your life raping and murdering White women and passing the time with stick-ups? What about the opportunity to do jobs for the Mafia? How about shooting school children?
          Fact: All of those things are more fun and more useful than reading an article by Anglin, or listening to a podcast by Tara McCarthy. Not that the rape and murder of White women is excusable (maybe the TV wasn’t working).
          Well, I should like to see this secret spot where you can get guns. I don’t know of any where I currently live. I suppose it makes sense in Manchester.
          I am glad that you told me this, and I did not even realise that you would even want to hang around someone like this guy. Though, I am not judging you. I suppose if I had the choice to befriend a freak like the Puerto Rican or to befriend an ordinary citizen, I would pick the serial killer/rapist.
          I have read your story about that Brazilian, but I never knew you actually lived here.

      3. I’ve never visited Brazil (btw, the Brazilian pardo story was a 2014 event in my UK life; above I’m talking of a Puerto Rican I met in 1999).
        I have met worse that the Puerto Rican, believe me!
        Back in 1985, I had as a roommate in San Rafael, California, USA, a former soldier from El Salvador. He boasted stories of his killings, and even assassinations (as a paid assassin after the war). He also told me how he had watched, when combating the guerrilla fighters in El Salvador, other soldiers skinning alive a guerrilla fighter, and another plucking out another fighter’s eye with a spoon.
        When you treat people of the Third World directly you meet quite an interesting fauna, believe me… (But don’t worry: if you visit Mexico City you’ll be in the safest neighbourhoods.)
        The bourgeois WNsts don’t realize that they live in a greenhouse like orchids reading essays about Batman in CC; a greenhouse that is about to break and they’ll have to deal with the wild vegetation outside it.
        I have had experience with wild veg. Do they?

        1. You say “I met a short pardo from Puerto Rica”.
          When I was using the term “pardo” I was referring to this Puerto Rican, rather than the Brazilian.
          The WNsts have lived charmed and sheltered lives. They would die of shock when coming across these anecdotes about how people can really be.

      4. Worse then that, Brits had loads of firearms leftover from Jew War Two. The Jews rounded them all up and the sheeple went along with it because it was ~ Gasp! ~ THE LAW!
        Yep, the Jew’s sacrosanct LAW did in Britain’s firearm ownership just as it did in the Soviet Union. Same with the other commonwealths. After all, who dares question their Jewed laws? And guess what, that was the very same issue Jesus had with the Temple ~ JEWED LAW! See the problem?
        It’s not the mono’s fault, it’s the morons fault.

  2. “If white nationalists abandoned their monocausalism to convert to the true religion, Hitlerism, what happened in England and many other places would not hurt us so much.”
    How so?

      1. “Muslim Jihadists” are a joke. Where were they twenty five years ago? Any planning for Jihadist action comes straight from the Jews’ playbook. Jews use these clowns as a tool, a “straw man” enemy, whom they can blame and use to justify their attacks.
        Older people have forgotten, and young people are unaware, that, before the evil Muslims, it was the “godless commies” planning on taking over the world. In those days “Commies” were the only enemy that had to be destroyed.
        The “terrible threat” presented by communism justified fifty years of cold war weapons technology development that was quickly exported to Israel. Here’s a clue, the scientific leaders of the Soviet’s nuclear weapons program were Jews. Big surprise to find the scientific leaders of America’s nuclear weapons program were also Jews.
        Before the evil “better-dead-than-red” “Commies,” it was it was the evil Nadzees who were also supposedly working hard to take over the world. This threat necessitated a second global war and the utter destruction of Germany. Yet before the “evil Nadzees” arose as the enemy de jour, the threat was the “hun beast” planning on conquering Europe. This presence of this dangerous enemy required the first global war. All during those earlier times, there wasn’t a Muslim Jihadist anywhere in sight.
        World history over the last one hundred years has been nothing but a continual succession of enemies so terrible they consumed the worlds’ attention, but then faded to nothingness like the Chimeras they actually were. Suddenly, out of nowhere a new enemy has arisen and once again this new enemy vows to take over the world. Proof of this is evident in how this new enemy, the “evil Muslim,” has flooded all Europe with third world miscreants.
        Before Iraq’s “Desert storm” and Trade Tower hoax, no one had ever heard of the “Muslim threat.” During the “Soviet threat,” era, few, very, very few, among the western world had ever heard the word “Muslim” and even fewer knew anything about them. No one knew or cared about any “Muslim threat.” No one knew or cared about “desert Arab tribes fighting small, internecine, tribal wars.
        Didn’t anyone read 1984? Is not the real plan obvious?
        Is it not obvious these phony enemies have been jinned up by Jews as straw man opposition to justify their duplicitous, murderous attacks on whomever and whenever (((they))) desire? Want to know who has been masturbating over the thought of global domination since Christ was a corporal? Want to know the real enemy that plans on taking over the world? Want to know who has been seriously attempting a global take-over since the end of the 19th century? Surprise! It’z the goddamned, shit-fucking, Jews, that’s who! It was never the “beastly huns,” evil Nadzees, “godless commies” or Muslim Jihadist, it has always been the goddamned, shit-fucking,* JEWS!
        Comprende? Capiche?
        *”Goddamned, shift-fucking” are not merely ugly metaphor or nasty pejoratives. These terms are quite literal when used to describe the perverse Jew. (((Their))) god YHVH repeatedly condemns and slaughters the ancient Hebrews/Israelites/Jews, hence the term “goddamned.” Jews are also notorious for their scatological fixation and homosexual tendencies that focus on anal sex, hence the term “shit-fucking.” It does not serve to identify Jews by terms other than those literally describing their race.

  3. It is those people.
    Andrew Anglin more ferociously attacks Atomwaffen division than people such as Trump.
    Ironically, the greatest DANGER to the white race now are it’s self proclaimed defenders who do nothing but serve as an outlet for white rage. I long pacified myself with Anglin’s articles-and then he attacked Hitlerism (and paganism) seemingly out of the blue and continued on with his worship of that treacherous fucking cow.Trump who gave us daughter to a kike.
    Ultimately though, I’m happy he did what he did because it forced me to act.


    1. This is how Anglin’s Stormer looked a while ago, and just see his metamorphosis into a castrated male. Disgusting…

      1. Yet he talks tough, especially concerning his faggy bodybuilding (you want to be big and muscular like me?). What was really starting to turn me off him was his American insecurities and how he would constantly talk about the manner in which his opponents would look and sound: calling them “beta males” for things as silly as wearing a certain type of shoe or preparing their hair in really insignificant ways.
        He does not realise that it is precisely this type of pseudo-alpha strutting that is causing so many insecurities among White teenage boys.
        And why has nobody mentioned this?:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9yv6QSryDk

      2. And then there’s the infamous “stacking bodies” in the street remark too.
        Disgusting.
        Also, I don’t know whether or not it’s true but I’ve heard that there’s footage of Anglin sodomizing Asian transsexuals which honestly wouldn’t surprise me

  4. One of the best arguments against monocausalism is a practical one: If you absolve whites of responsibility for their own condition you remove from them the power to change it. The truly innocent victim isn’t a moral agent. His fate was unavoidable, and will always be unavoidable.
    Therefore, constant whining about Jews is counterproductive. The focus should always be on what whites could do, or should be doing, to improve their situation. I have myself suggested a few things, but there has been, shall we say, a lack of interest. I don’t think that would be the case if people were sincerely interested in their own racial survival.
    Also, I’d like to mention in passing that there are some disturbing similarities between the arguments and thought patterns presented by monos and those who argue for racial equality. Namely, in both cases, they want their interlocutors to prove a negative. Monos want you to prove that Jews were NOT involved in producing the current situation, while racial egalitarians want you to prove that environment is NOT the cause of racial inequality. If a mono can find a Jew involved in something, even in a peripheral way (and there almost always is), suddenly all blame is shifted to the Jew. Likewise, if a racial egalitarian can find any sort of environmental difference (and there are always differences), then that is what is blamed for racial difference.
    The philosophical difficulties involved in proving a negative are well known. For example, I cannot prove to you that Santa Claus does not exist. Likewise, I cannot prove to you that Jews, or Freemasons, or the Illuminati, or “globalists”, are not the cause of all white problems. If you are already convinced of the contrary, my efforts to do so will fall upon deaf ears, just as they would if I were to argue for inborn racial differences with an anti-racist. In all cases, it’s merely a question of worldview; less about facts than how the facts are related.

    1. I have myself suggested a few things, but there has been, shall we say, a lack of interest.

      I apologise in advance if I’ve lacked interest in something you have suggested. Can you briefly recapitulate such suggestions?

      1. Remove the technological underpinnings that sustain the current situation. Want whites to be as they were before modernity? Then remove modernity. Use technique to destroy it.
        There are ways to cause the system collapse rather than just waiting for it. But nobody seems to be even slightly interested in this. There are ways to discuss it, perhaps in a fictionalized way, as Pierce did in The Turner Diaries, that avoid the limitations of Brandenburg. Or, watch the movie Twelve Monkeys for a preview of one possibility. Of course, the task is difficult, and anyone who has the genius to see what needs to be done and do something so world-changing won’t need my help in figuring out how to do it.

      2. Yes: I have quoted that film on this site (here) and also fantasized about the virus. But since I believe that the dollar will crash (and perhaps after that the world will suffer a slow energy devolution), I prefer to wait for the collapse to unfold naturally. Otherwise all the nymphs of my sidebar could die after the virus pandemics.
        No cute babies gone with the dirty bathwater.✋🏻😉

      3. “Otherwise all the nymphs of my sidebar could die after the virus pandemics.”
        That’s a strange objection from someone who is convinced those nymphs are going extinct anyway. A global pandemic with nearly 100% lethality would save some of them, at least.

      4. I’m not the anti-Christ, only his prophet. But if young white men were sincerely interested in their race’s survival, you’d think that virology would be only one of many avenues they’d be exploring to bring the system down. Instead, as I said, there’s zero interest in doing anything along those lines. Ignoring Kaczynski’s fine example (He’s a criminal! A madman!) they want to take the system over and build it up, not bring it down. Case-in-point: At Charlottesville, they called policemen “sir”, not pigs. Disrespecting the police and the law just isn’t in them. Because the white man loves his civilization more than his race, he doesn’t even allow himself to dream of such things. For example, what WN work of fiction imagines the possibilities of a post-technological world? None I know of. And even if one were written, I doubt it would be popular with them. Young, racially conscious white men prefer to stick with a losing strategy. Whining about Jews is so much safer and more satisfying!

      5. This is a passage from my ¿Me Ayudarás?, quoting an old diary:

        Muchas mañanas me despierto con gran deseo de exterminar a la humanidad, hoy con tubo de ensayo con letal virus estrellándolo en el aeropuerto internacional de NY.

        Translation:

        Many mornings I wake up with great desire to exterminate humanity, today with a test tube with a lethal virus crashing it at the international airport in NY.

  5. I would define strict monocausalism as the doctrine that preaches on the Internet that Jews are one hundred percent responsible for the Aryan decline, and the latter completely innocent.

    Never have I said Jews are the sole cause of our misery. What I do maintain is that they are THE primary cause and until their destructive presence is addressed, there is no hope for our survival.
    After all, how can one fight an enemy of which he is not aware? And how many would you estimate are aware of the Jew problem? Yet you focus on the white man and his religion. Is this helping enlighten the foolish goyim to the presence of the parasitical Jew?
    Every left wing clown out there would agree the white man is the problem, so no problem getting every anti-white clown on the bandwagon with the idea that the white man is the base cause of all problems.
    Jews and their “left wing” “liberal” cohorts are quick to embrace both your anti-Christian and your “white man” as the problem stance, so whom are you helping by supporting these ideas?
    The answer is to rid the white man of the Jews and their religion. In the end, what might be more effective for disabusing the white man’s presence?

  6. There are things that cannot be discussed on the internet. Wouldn’t it be good to come together to a place to discuss what we are going to do when the system pops? Why don’t you visit Mexico City as tourists
    i’m on board. i think it’s time for face-to-face time. who else?

    1. There is some tour for you guys: The big pyramids outside the city, the huge museum of anthropology (with plenty of evidence of the sacrifices the Amerinds perpetrated); some very wealthy neighbourhoods that only with my car we could get in, and also the real, disgusting Mexico.
      In a weekend I could show you all that.

      1. more than a tour, i want to sit down with creative others and discuss objectives/ strategies/ tactics (ost). i don’t speak or read spanish, so such a gathering may require an interpreter. certainly doable & affordable. how many meetings over a week’s stay? again, what are others thinking/ suggesting?

      2. No native Spanish-speaker (except me) will be present, as almost all of them in this continent seem to be fans of the blue pill. So the language will be English.

  7. “The answer is to rid the white man of the Jews and their religion. ”
    That’s an approach that’s been tried numerous times, and it’s always failed. Repeating a failed strategy doesn’t seem like much of an answer to me.

    1. Not really, there was a time when this could have been achieved, but our forebears neglected it and now we are facing the consequences.
      NS Germany proved beyond any doubt that once you remove the virus things are fine. Blaming them for NOT exterminating kikes en masse is useless because by that time the latter’s centre of power wasn’t within handreach. When we could turn back the clock let’s say 500 years it could be done, up until the last embryo and its carrier.
      But it probably was christianity that protected the kikes from that fate. Even in those days it was well known what they were up to, and in all classes of society. Hence all those old sayings – based on experience – about jews in just about every known language.
      Healthy people would ruthlessly exterminate any mortal enemy as fast as they could, only people infected and weakened with alien malware will restrict themselves to only banning.

      1. and aphabet (google) is a big presence in the dna/ microbiology world. (gee, federal whore?) which means even darker and more threatening storm clouds over whitie’s world.

      2. “NS Germany proved beyond any doubt that once you remove the virus things are fine.”
        According to researcher Mark Rigg, there were 150,000 Jews in the Wehrmacht.
        LINK
        “But it probably was christianity that protected the kikes from that fate. ”
        The Romans under Titus weren’t Christians, and yet didn’t practice exterminationism either. They sacked Jerusalem and created the Diaspora.
        Throughout history there have been hundreds of pogroms and expulsions, yet Jews have always been too useful for the white man’s civilization project to totally exterminate. There are always a few who are allowed to stay, because in the final analysis the white man needs Jews to help him build the prison he’s constructing for himself. They keep civilization rolling along.

      3. Not only that there were Jews in the Wehrmacht but the first head of the SS was a Jew, Emil Maurice! Hitler was SS member No. 1 and Maurice SS member No. 2. Maurice looks like the Jew Charlie Chaplin. Imagine that, the head of the SA a homosexual and the head of the SS a Jew. But it is true. NS germany wasn’t as pure as some people think (or like to make out). For example, according to the Nuremberg Laws, if you were a Jew who was 1/8 Jewish you were considered German and given full German citizenship. This is part of the reason why I don’t worship Hitler or NS Germany. It may have been the highest level Aryans have reached but it was not perfect and I’m convinced we can do better in the future. National Socialism should not be the last word.
        Civilization, especially modern industrial civilization, is an out-of control monolith that is not to the Earth’s benefit, nor the White Man’s benenfit. Of course I understand that if a race advances upwards from barbarism to complex civilization and technology the result can only be along the lines of what we see. But a breakdown of civilization and a return to barbarism would do a world of good for the White Man. I like Charles Manson’s ideas of a return to a pre-urban, pre-Christian, rural ‘Heathen’ way of life. The Jewish creeds of Christianity and Bolshevism are urban and cosmopolitan creeds, universalist and envision humanity with dominion over Nature, the older pagan religions were tribal and Nature-centred. Ted Kaczynski’s ideas are good too.

      4. Quoted from the wiki:

        After Himmler had become Reichsführer-SS, Maurice fell afoul of Himmler’s racial purity rules for SS officers when he had to submit details of his family history before he was allowed to marry in 1935. Himmler stated, “without question…Maurice is, according to his ancestral table, not of Aryan descent”. All SS officers had to prove racial purity back to 1750, and it turned out that Maurice had Jewish ancestry: Charles Maurice Schwartzenberger (1805–1896), the founder of the Thalia Theater in Hamburg, was his great-grandfather.

      5. “According to researcher Mark Rigg, there were 150,000 Jews in the Wehrmacht.”
        Yes, I’ve heard of that one before too. It could be true, of course, I don’t know. However, when I read Heinz Weichardt’s ( most fascinating ) true story I somehow have my doubts about that.
        “There are always a few who are allowed to stay”
        Not in all cases, but indeed, they always seem to get pardoned after some time,
        ” because in the final analysis the white man needs Jews to help him build the prison he’s constructing for himself.”
        I don’t agree, because you say “the white man” which means the white race as a whole, and that is simply not true. It is always the ruler(s) who allow them back in, usually, no, correction, ALWAYS for personal gain, while the other 99,999999999999999999% of the white race ( not as if any local tribe, city, county, kingdom or country represents the entire white race in the first place anyway ), is totally oblivious of it. It is those treacherous rulers who are the weak links of our race, not the overwhelming majority of them.And not all rulers of all white cities, counties, kingdoms or countries are as like that.
        However, the consequences of this local treason do, when the jew is given enough time to create a stronghold, even only a local one, in the end affect and inflict all other white cities, counties, kingdoms and countries.
        And this is definitely NOT a defect exclusive for the white race. Weak treacherous sellouts come in all shapes and colors.

      6. I don’t agree, because you say “the white man” which means the white race as a whole, and that is simply not true. It is always the ruler(s) who allow them back in, usually, no, correction, ALWAYS for personal gain, while the other 99,999999999999999999% of the white race ( not as if any local tribe, city, county, kingdom or country represents the entire white race in the first place anyway ), is totally oblivious of it.

        I think this doesn’t help you, as civilization has always had rulers. Indeed, the condition of having rulers and ruled is a good working definition of the fundamentals of civilization. The rulers plan everything regarding its expansion, including who’s in and who’s out. Therefore, what is useful to the rulers is useful for civilization. None of this exonerates the white race from complicity. If the white race wanted race purity above civilization, they would have chosen a different course.
        I believe that race mixing is actually an expression of the white man’s civilizational confidence. So long as his civilization remains, he really believes he can survive his own demise. Just as in the Christian heaven, which he has faith he will enter when his body dies, and where all races will bask equally in the love of rabbi Jesus for all eternity, he thinks this world’s technological civilization can create a heaven in which all the races are equal, and equally enjoy its usufructs. The Christian idea of the supposed brotherhood of man is thus a necessary tool of social control designed to bring such a condition about; it’s part and parcel of civilization. Jewish propaganda designed to bring about race mixing is likewise a necessary part of the white man’s civilization project. If there were no Jews or no Christianity, the white man would have needed to invent them to further civilization’s expansion.

      7. Well, have it your way. I guess we will not agree.
        All I can add further is that if this is the actual problem, if it isn’t christianity or the jews, IOW, if this is simply inbuilt and thus inevitable, then we can stop worrying and wasting our time debating this because we have to let nature take its course.
        Why would we take up armed struggle? Against who or what? Obviously the problem isn’t christianity or the jews, it’s us. Well, we could start shooting each other and give nature a helping hand.
        I would even go further than that, if we want to live according to nature’s laws we are obliged to let nature take its course resulting in the extinction of Aryans.
        Look at it on the bright side, now we will have a lot more time to enjoy life.
        Cheers.

      8. “…if this is the actual problem, if it isn’t christianity or the jews, IOW, if this is simply inbuilt and thus inevitable…”
        It seems pretty clear that the ideology of the brotherhood of man is a necessary technology of empire, and so in that sense is inevitable. As has been mentioned, it preceded Christianity and was already in operation during the time of Alexander the Great, and promoted by him. It’s also such a simple technology that, like schools or spears, it would probably be impossible to eliminate it completely.
        However, as I indicated in this thread, there is reason to think that technological development itself can be limited, and if so the growth of empire can be restrained. The Romans would probably still have needed something like Christianity to unite their far-flung empire even if they had never encountered it. But if technology had remained static, their dealings with other races would have been limited by the geographic barriers between the major races already in place. Then the racial damage that their empire could do from its component populations mixing would have been limited.
        Limiting the growth of empire by limiting technological development is a solution to the problem posed, but not solved, by Frank Salter in his influential 2002 paper on ethnic genetic interests. He doesn’t see that once technology has developed to the point that empires become global, as it has today, then nation states lose power, and ethnic genetic interests necessarily are fatally compromised.

  8. Blaming Whites for their own predicament is a symptom of jewish gaslighting. The psychological abuse is so deep that even pro-Whites like chechar can’t help but blame their own race for what jews have done to them.
    Age of Treason has it right. jews are to blame for all of this. You don’t blame the host for what the parasite has done. Anyone who disagrees is quite simply, objectively wrong.

  9. @Spahn Ranch. If you honestly believe that you are the only person who supports certain forms of Civilisation a la Kaczynski, then you have clearly not been paying a lot of attention to my words.

  10. “When I lived in Manchester in 1999, I met a short pardo from Puerto Rico who travelled with an American passport. He used to boast about his adventures to abduct and rape American girls within the US itself; and that sometimes he had to kill them because they were screaming. He fled to the UK to avoid being caught in the US after so many offenses.
    I had a problem in the UK and he even lent me a hundred pounds to purchase my plane ticket. But before that he told me about his plans to rob a jewellery store in London, and I even accompanied him to a secret place in Manchester where real men bought guns.”

    Where, I hope, he accidentally shot himself with gun he was buying?