Read our featured article here!
We depend on the support of our readers. Please donate today. Monthly donations are particularly helpful. If, to protect your privacy, you can’t use PayPal, we can receive funds by mail. Contact us: ([email protected] – or – [email protected] – or – [email protected]).
Green
Yesterday I rewatched the movie Soylent Green, which I saw on the big screen in 1973.
Those were times when the System hadn’t yet completely poisoned the minds of whites to the point of making them believe there was a war between male and female, and that the System was going to protect females through legal and cultural reforms…
I was particularly struck by the scene where police officer Robert Thorn (Charlton Heston) enters the party of Shirl, a beautiful young woman referred to as “piece of furniture,” who had been assigned as a sex slave to a wealthy, although very humane, shareholder (the party takes place after the shareholder was murdered by the Soylent company).
Thorn arrives at the party and, although he defends the women from the concierge’s abusive behaviour, the way he takes a glass of ice from a beautiful blonde, and momentarily a cigarette from another young woman (he takes a drag and gives it back), as well as ordering Shirl to go straight to bed, portrays how the culture at that time perceived male-female relationships.
There’s another scene, my favourite in the film: when Sol Roth (Edward G. Robinson), an elderly former teacher and Thorn’s deputy, realises that the cookies the government distributes to the hungry and unemployed town are made from recycled human waste, and decides to go to the local euthanasia centre.
“Home” is a public institution where people can go to end their miserable lives in a calm and peaceful environment, with images and videos. In fact, at “Home” Roth can enjoy, for twenty minutes before dying, classical music (we hear the opening bars of Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony) and beautiful scenes of nature, in which we can see what the world was like before the ecological disaster.
The preceding scene, when Sol walks towards Home, fascinates me for many reasons.
For a decadent society like ours to have “Homes” everywhere for those who can no longer endure living in the West’s darkest hour, it would first have to overcome Christian ethics. Very few people know that psychiatry is based on these ethics, even though it is presumably a medical profession and one hundred per cent secular.
In reality, if the ancient Greeks already knew the trauma model of mental disorders—that is, that some parents drive their children mad (as Clytemnestra drove mad her daughter Electra)—it was simply because the Greco-Roman world lacked the commandment to honour your parents. The Greek playwrights who wrote family tragedies saw things as they were and called a spade a spade.
Given the Aryan’s enslavement to the Fourth Commandment, in Christendom blaming parents was done indirectly, as revealed in fairy tales (in addition to that post, I also uploaded others about Snow White, Hansel & Gretel, and Peter Pan). In the 21st century, the Fourth Commandment persists in secular writers. In the Harry Potter books and films, for example, there is the same shift we observe in the aforementioned fairy tales: from Harry’s parents to his uncle and aunt to avoid touching the parental deities (the perpetrators in real life).
Now then: psychiatry blames the brains of children with disorders or suicidal ideation without any proof that their condition is biomedical, as Robert Whitaker says in this brief clip. And if it dismisses the trauma model without refuting it, it is due to its neochristian ethics: never taking parents off their pedestal. I discuss this in a passage of my trilogy, and I believe I’m the first critic of the profession to connect Christian ethics with this pseudoscience taught in medical schools.
But I’ve gone way off on a tangent. I was saying that my favourite scene is when Sol walks on his way to Home to be euthanised in a very pleasant ceremony.
For the West to have free euthanasia centres for those who can no longer endure this nightmare, with branches of “Homes” everywhere, it would have had to first reject Christian ethics.
In the Middle Ages, suicide or suicidal ideation was considered a sin of divine lèse-majesté because it was assumed that only God (that is, the god of the Jews) had the right to take a life, even one’s own. But almost no one knows that after the so-called Enlightenment, this divine lèse-majesté sin was renamed in psychiatry as “brain disorder of unknown aetiology.” That is to say, the Christian and atheistic neochristian moral compass is the same. The pseudoscientists simply replaced one myth with another, while suicide or assisted suicide was tolerated in pre-Constantine Rome, given that the Romans didn’t then obey the commands of the Jewish god. The transition from divine lèse-majesté to “biomedical entity of unknown aetiology” (that is: no biological marker yet found) was an axiological alchemy whose substrate had always been a Judeo-Christian mandate internalised in the Aryan collective unconscious.
What I liked about the Soylent Green scene since adolescence was that it offered a release from the horrors of that dystopian world for an old man, Sol, who lived only on nostalgia, having lived in times before the environmental and demographic collapse we see in the film. What fascinated me most was the moment when Sol arrived walking to Home, and a very pleasant girl opened the door for him before he even knocked. That’s the kind of white women I saw in my day, and my longing for them is endless!
Although there are few white people in Mexico, I remember their mannerisms, and it fills me with great nostalgia to recall memories of women behaving like women!
Since my mind was formed in the 1960s and the first half of the 70s, I retained that image of women. So when I see for a few seconds the films made today, with extremely masculinized women and extremely feminized men—the opposite of the woman above or officer Thorn—, I feel such infinite repulsion that I not only stop watching the audio-visual monstrosity that the System puts in front of me, but I can’t even talk to those who enjoy such things!
The saddest thing of all is that people of my generation seem to have forgotten those traditional male-female roles (even though as kids they also saw films like Soylent Green on the big screen), and they jump on the Ship of Fools, watching and enjoying what is being done in the film industry today.
The DVD with the title they gave it in Spanish on a shelf in my studio.
In my day, there were cafes in Mexico City where some men, descendants of Spaniards, would go to chat in the afternoons. Now there’s nothing like that anymore. After my workday (basically proofreading my trilogy), it’s sad that I have to watch a movie like the one I saw yesterday because those cafes are gone and I can’t talk to anyone in this city of over twenty million inhabitants! And since I naturally don’t watch the FIFA World Cup 2026 matches (Mexico played against Korea yesterday), at least yesterday I could take refuge in one of the DVDs I have of movies I saw as a kid…
I don’t understand why, with these Sabine women as the reward for our efforts to seize power in every Aryan nation, the vast majority of white racialists still aren’t thinking like Mauricio!
“In a hundred years, either Whites will be ‘Nazis’ and anti-Christian, or they will barely exist and be on their way to extinction”. —Mjölner
Equal rights for women requires men to be neutered.
Neutered men, however, cannot defend a nation from subversive merchants.
Equal rights for women is therefore national suicide.
Only by the destruction of feminism will men regrow their manhood [Editor’s emphasis] and subjugate the merchants.
Plato warned explicitly in his Republic that when you flatten a society with equality, you destroy the natural hierarchy. Men lose their edge, become obsessed with comfort, and trade the severe discipline of the gymnasium for soft, civilian luxury. Once you level the sexes, you strip the protective class of the raw masculine spine required to form a phalanx.
Aristotle took it a step further by mapping out exactly what happens next. He argued that a nation dominated by merchant interests, trading, and luxury will always turn corrupt. When the men of a nation are softened by comfort and untethered from their traditional duty as masters of the household, they lose the ability to see or resist mercantile subversion. They stop acting like guardians and start acting like helpless consumers, leaving the gates wide open for hostile forces to buy up the infrastructure.
The great historian Polybius called this predictable cycle of decay anacyclosis. He showed that when a state descends into chaos and mob rule, nobody is coming to save it through a standard political vote. The only historical cure for terminal decadence is a severe, uncompromising reset—a tectonic return to right order and the absolute authority of the man as lord of the household.
forget The West’s Darkest Hour’s posts about Nordicism!
“Show Wotan to the people,
and Wotan will be lit in its soul.”
—Carl Jung
Christianing Christianly,
as the late Alex would say
by Gaedhal
Archbishop Eamon Martin says that we must not merely welcome the invader, we must integrate them, i.e. interbreed with them. This is Christ-cuckery cranked up to eleven.
According to Catholic doctrine, that Sudanese invader who tried to behead that fellow has infinite dignity; he possesses a soul with infinite worth, that is made in the image and likeness of the Jewish god.
Ireland will either be Christian or it will be white. Christianity will be the death of us.
And the Irish News, let us remember, has the tagline pro patria et fide, i.e. for the country/Ireland and the [Catholic] faith… even though the Catholic Faith is utterly destroying the country. The Irish News—which, I maintain, must be part-owned by the Catholic Church—has a severe lack of journalistic skepticism when it comes to platforming Catholic priests, and repeating Catholic legends, like the ghastly scrap, the “relic” of “Saint Brigid”, which was recently transferred to Kildare.
The term patria, in Latin, comes from pater, i.e., we the country are the posterity of those Irishmen who came before us. They are our ethnic fathers. However, the subversive Christian New Testament tells us not to squabble about our gentile genealogies. No, being an adopted child of Abraham, “spiritually” is all that matters. Of course, the fictional character, Jesus, told us to love our enemies and welcome the Xenos or stranger, because he was invented to destroy us.
Christianity hasn’t been subverted: it is the subversion.
P.S.
The Bible verse about genealogies is: “Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do” (1st Timothy 1:4 KJV).
The word for fable here is: muthois, i.e. ‘myths’. We are to abandon our gentile myths for the gruesome circumcision myths of the Old Testament, like Abraham slicing up Isaac’s foreskin, or David harvesting 200 foreskins so as to purchase his wife Michal from Saul. Our gentile genealogies do not matter… however the fictional genealogies of the Bible matter. All of this was covered in A Real Case Against the Jews. A country so barren in the middle east that trees find it hard to grow—which is why we know that the “Palm Sunday” myth never happened—has now become “the Holy Land” instead of the forested lands of Europe: our homelands.
And, as I said before: the otherworldliness of Christianity is antithetical to what we believe in; what you might call, poetically, “the priesthood of the 14 words”. If you believe that there is a “better country even a heavenly”, then this diminishes the value of this country, this side of the grave, in the here and now.
As I said before: a big part of my deconversion was when my political beliefs began to clash with my religious beliefs.
words (in The Occidental Observer):
Where men are in charge, women have babies; where women are in charge, they fornicate and abort — as we have learned by putting women in charge for a few decades.
Besides an end to “equal pay for equal work,” unilateral divorce must be abolished. No man should marry when his life can be ruined at any instant at the whim of a fickle or vindictive woman.
is an enemy to NS Germany
Below we can read a passage from a letter from Reinhard Heydrich to Lammers on August 17, 1940:
With the request for information, I am submitting in the appendix a report on a brochure that was published for mass distribution by the Catholic press centre in France, the Maison de la Bonne Presse.
This brochure, La Hierarchie Catholique et la Guerre, shows with unequivocal clarity how the Catholic hierarchy, with the Pope at the top, sided with the enemy powers in its statements on the current war and agitated against National Socialist Germany.
Never have the leading representatives of the Catholic Church expressed their true opinion about National Socialist Germany more clearly than in their encyclicals, pastoral letters, etc., which are compiled in this brochure and which they published at the beginning of this war, when they still believed in a victory for the Western powers.
The source is cited in the image above, in large letters.