Read our featured article here!
We depend on the support of our readers. Please donate today. Monthly donations are particularly helpful. If, to protect your privacy, you can’t use PayPal, we can receive funds by mail. Contact us: ([email protected] – or – [email protected] – or – [email protected]).
problem
I was planning to post something today, but something came up in my life (one of my brothers said some nonsense to me in an email) that will take a couple of days—or more—to write a thoughtful letter in response.
I won’t go into details. Those who have read Susan Forward’s Toxic Parents know the chapter where Forward discusses how those siblings who weren’t abused react to the abused adult child who dares to speak out about the crimes committed by their parents.
As soon as I finish writing the long letter I plan to send my brother, I’ll get back to my usual activities here.
“No, the government is locked into its present course of social and racial destruction. It does not have the will to change its fundamentally destructive policies. Nothing but a total revolution can bring about the changes necessary to minimize alienation, restore the faith of White citizens in the government, and eliminate terrorism. That’s why I’m a revolutionary instead of a conservative or a reformer.”
—Dr. William Luther Pierce, “How Liberals Think”
Lane (1938-2007) was one of the main pro-white activists in the movement. He rejected Christianity and instead embraced pagan beliefs such as Odinism/Wotanism. Here’s what he said about Christianity and white Christians:
“If the White Aryan race is to survive much longer, then a momentous decision must be made now. If we continue to compromise with the religious and secular institutions which deny Nature’s laws, and which have led us to the brink of extinction, then we are doomed.”
“Under Christian influence the White race now faces imminent extinction, having given our food, medicine, technology and wealth to alien races in a competitive world. And now surrendering our territory and women.”
“The Identity Christian leaders should have restricted their title to just one word, i.e. Identity. And admit to the absolute and undeniable fact that in both its creation and effect, the New Testament religion is suicidal racial poison [emphasis by Ed.].”
“Christians deny Nature’s laws and suppress their natural instincts for racial survival because an anti-nature religion has driven them literally insane [ibid.].”
“So to all you Christians and Americans with White skin I say, abandon the anti-nature deceptions of the Universalist materialists and pleasure seekers, or face the consequences of the passing of Western Civilization’s creators. Naturally, there are those who will attack my words in this treatise for various reasons. Some because they are committed univerisalist racial enemies. Some because as Christians or Jews they are indoctrinated to literally believe the myths of their religion. Some because they benefit from the current political or religious systems in financial or material ways. Some because they are cowards who are afraid to face unpleasant truths. Some because their minds are poisoned with geographical nationalistic propaganda which is a perversion of the territorial instinct. This perversion of the territorial instinct is why White men will spend money supporting an athletic team composed of non-white players, each with a harem of the last pretty white young women [ibid.]. This too is conditioned insanity leading to racial suicide.”
—The Collection of the Works of David Lane, “Open Letter to All Christians”, pages 326-332.
I think I’ve finally figured out why this site gets so few comments compared to a dozen years ago when it got quite a few. It has to do with my criticism of white nationalists, whom I contrast with the National Socialists of the last century. Because I’ve been so abrasive in my prose, visitors don’t like it, as they’re under the impression that American white nationalism is more or less immaculate.
I realised this because on Twitter I’ve been commenting on white nationalism without being so abrasive, and sometimes I get a lot of likes. What am I doing wrong here? Should I stop speaking ill of American white nationalism the way I didn’t a dozen years ago?
The problem is that even back then, there were Americans who were aware of the contradictions within American white nationalism. For example, in 2015 Jack Frost said something that really caught my attention in the comments section of The Occidental Observer, so much so that I quoted him in a post titled “On turning Americans into Nazis.” Frost commented:
In order to accept being called a racist or a Nazi with equanimity, normal American whites would have to reconcile that with their country’s history of being violently opposed to racism of any kind, from the Civil War forward. They would have to admit to themselves and to others that all of that bloodshed in trying to stamp out racism had been shed in vain, and in fact, worse than in vain, in an evil cause. They would have to admit that their ancestors were evil, and that they themselves had also been evil [emphasis added] before they saw the light and became racists.
It’s safe to say the chances of that happening on a mass scale are almost zero.
Bingo. If you realise you have to hate your culture to save your race, where will you get the quorum? What webzines like Counter-Currents do is not go for the jugular of American culture, but rather publish articles that don’t offend sensibilities: articles that a conservative can tolerate.
But that’s not what I do—I call a spade a spade! That means money will flow to sites like Counter-Currents, a webzine whose ideology I highly doubt will save the Anglo-Germans of the North (I live in Mexico) from their impending extinction, and that I count on few donations even though my ideology potentially could save them…
That’s why Michael O’Meara caught my attention so much, a revolutionary writer on Counter-Currents, unlike the merely reactionary ones who comment there and on other racialist forums (O’Meara may already be dead since nothing has been heard from him in several years).
Frost hit the nail on the head. Sometimes a single comment on a racialist webzine is worth more than the “serious” articles being published on those forums. And if Frost is right, for The West’s Darkest Hour to receive more donations and comments, visitors would have to realise that their grandpas were actually the bad guys, and that they themselves are bad for not honouring Hitler (despite his mistakes).
Changing the subject, since I’ve mentioned the American historian Mark Weber more than once this month, I’d like to link to one of his articles in which Weber disagrees with the consensus on the Second World War, here.
Talmud Readers by Adolf Behrman.
Below, selected quotes from Adam Green’s 2026 book The Jesus Deception: A Mystical Midrashic Myth:
______ 卐 ______
What is Midrash?
Midrash is the ancient Jewish technique of interpreting, elaborating, and even rewriting scripture to uncover hidden meanings, resolve contradictions, or apply old texts to new contexts. It is not merely commentary…
This bringing together of widely separate scriptural references and deriving meaning and scenarios from their combination was the secret to creating the early Christian message… Jewish midrash was the process by which the Christian recipe was put together and baked into the doctrine of the divine Son who had been sacrificed for salvation.
Talmudic Scholar Dr. Daniel Boyarin explains in his book The Jewish Gospels how the New Testament is a product of midrashic mythmaking which was commonplace tradition in second temple Judaism:
The Gospels use perfectly traditional, midrashic ways of reasoning to develop these ideas and apply them to Jesus. Indeed, in the Gospels these ideas (Suffering and rejected Messiah and Son of Man) have been derived from the Torah by that most Jewish of exegetical styles, the way of midrash. That the Messiah would suffer and be humiliated was something Jews learned from a close reading of scripture in precisely the style of classically rabbinic interpretation known as midrash…
That Paul and the Gospels used Midrash is not contested. Even Christian authors agree Paul was incorporating Midrash…
The concept of Midrash is crucial for understanding early Christianity. The New Testament writers were themselves Jews [emphasis by Ed.], steeped in this tradition of scriptural interpretation. When they portrayed Jesus, they used midrashic techniques, re-reading the Hebrew Bible to learn of his life, death, and mission. This is why so much of the Gospel narrative appears to “fulfill” older texts: the evangelists were not simply recording biography but crafting a theological portrait using the interpretive art of midrash, just as their Jewish contemporaries did the Dead Sea Scrolls, in the Talmud and Kabbalistic and apocryphal texts.
Temple in Nymphenburg Palace Park
Setting the record straight
To say that Nietzsche did not have a profound influence on Hitler would be denying one of the core individuals within National Socialism’s ideological tradition of optimism and will-power. Many have seen the infamous photo of Hitler in the Nietzsche-Archiv, but few seem to know the official caption behind it. In Heinrich Hoffmann’s book Hitler, the original caption reads: “The Führer at the bust of the German philosopher whose ideas inspired two great popular movements: that of National Socialist Germany and that of Fascist Italy.” [1] So, already off the bat, we see a public connection between Hitler and Nietzsche in official sources. Keep in mind that Hitler endorsed the Nietzsche-Archiv by privately funding it, giving 50,000 Reichsmarks. [2]
On July 30th of 1943, the NSDAP had documented that Adolf Hitler had personally gifted Mussolini a unique edition of the collected works of Nietzsche on his birthday:
The Führer sent the Duce, as a personal gift for his 60th birthday, through Field Marshal von Kesselring, the collected works of Nietzsche in a specially produced, unique edition with a heartfelt dedication. [3]
If Hitler had not been influenced or simply had ignored Nietzsche, there would be no reason for Hitler to openly suggest the works of Nietzsche to others. The official NSDAP stance on Nietzsche was that he was: “the greatest defender and justifier of life and reality” [4]. This was then justified by Hitler when, in 1942, he appealed to Nietzsche’s words for his own rightful fanatical optimism:
Whoever thinks he can frighten me somehow or surprise me is wrong. I have always taken to heart the words of a great German philosopher: “A blow that does not knock a strong man over, only makes him stronger.” [5]
In private, Hitler had equally praised Nietzsche. According to Walther Hewel in a conversation about Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche in 1941, Hitler said that Nietzsche was:
More intuitive than purely analytical. Affirmation of the laws of nature and of struggle. Positive user manual. Hence, the true philosopher of National Socialism. [6]
Goebbels corroborates this in 1943. In a conversation, he noted Hitler to have said: “Nietzsche is naturally much closer to our viewpoint than Schopenhauer.” [7]
So it appears that Hitler had approved of Friedrich Nietzsche both publicly and privately.
___________________
Bibliography:
[1] Heinrich Hoffmann: Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, 100 Bild-Dokumente aus dem Leben des Führers
[2] BArch R 43-II/894c Nietzsche-Institut Weimar 1935 p.63
[3] Der Führer: das Hauptorgan der NSDAP Gau Baden; der badische Staatsanzeiger 31.07.1943 p.1
[4] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #08 „Staat und Kirchen im 19. Jahrhundert“ (Reichsorganisationsleiter der NSDAP) p.299
[5] Völkischer Beobachter, Die Rede des Führers im Berliner Sportpalast, Januar 30,1942 p.3
[6] Diaries and Papers of Botschafter Hewel. Nachlass Walther Hewel. Microfilm DJ-75. Filmed February 1971. Film No 96928, Reel 23 [EP Microform Limited] p.151
[7] NARA, RG 242, T-84, Roll 264 p.296
by Joseph Goebbels on Adolf Hitler
and the Christian Question
[Conversation] with the Führer
He also admires the courage of the Greeks in particular. Perhaps there is still a touch of the old Hellenic strain in them. The Serbs are fighting desperately. But once the first resistance has been broken, then the great retreat will begin. More detailed information on the progress of the operations is not yet available. Things must be given time to develop. Piraeus has been mined. The Führer forbids the bombing of Athens. This is right and noble of him. Rome and Athens are his Meccas [emphasis by Ed.]. He greatly regrets having to fight the Greeks. If the English had not established themselves there, he never would have gone to the Italians’ aid. It was their affair, and they should have been able to settle it alone.
The Führer is man totally attuned to antiquity. He hates Christianity, because it has crippled all that is noble in humanity. According to Schopenhauer, Christianity and syphilis have made humanity unhappy and unfree. What a difference between the benevolent, smiling Zeus and the pain-wracked, crucified Christ. The ancient peoples’ view of God was also more noble and more humane than the Christians’. What a difference between a gloomy cathedral and a light, airy ancient temple. He describes life in ancient Rome: clarity, greatness, monumentality. The most wonderful republic in history. We would feel no disappointment, he believes, if we were now suddenly to be transported to this old, eternal city.
The Führer cannot relate to the Gothic mind. He hates gloom and brooding mysticism. He wants clarity, light, beauty. And these are the ideals of life in our time. In this respect, the Führer is a totally modern man.
To him, the Augustinian period [Augustan Age of ancient Rome (27 b.c.e. to 14 c.e.) —Ed.] is the high point of history.[1]
Thank you, Martin Kerr, for bringing the above quote to my attention. I would like to add this one I saw yesterday on Twitter:
Hitler expressed agreement with Nietzsche’s rejection of Christianity. In January 1941, Goebbels recorded in his diary that Hitler was riled up against scholars, including philosophers, but he made an exception for Nietzsche, who, he asserted: “Only Nietzsche is an exception here. He proved in detail the absurdity of Christianity. In two hundred years it will only remain a grotesque memory. We must gradually undermine it in all areas. Above all, among the younger generation.”
Thus, Hitler approved of Nietzsche’s anti-Christian stance and predicted the ultimate demise of Christianity.[2]
___________
[1] Source: The Goebbels Diaires: 1939-1941. Translated and edited by Fred Taylor, Penguin Books, NY, 1982. Entry for April 8, 1941, pp. 304-305.
[2] Barch N 1118/13 Die Tagebücher von Joseph Goebbels, Eintrag vom 30. Januar 1941, p.64.
“And if in the end Aryan man, the supremely gifted and most masterful race known to history, should disappear from the Earth, the primary reason for it will be his having succumbed to the virus of Christianity.”
—William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man?, page 89.
refutes the WN and NS paradigm
Following up on what I said last Saturday, I would like to show how we differ not only from American white nationalism but also from German National Socialism.
We believe that Christianity is the primary cause of the Aryan decline, not a secondary cause as seems to emerge from Hitler’s conversations with close friends, or from Himmler’s lectures to the SS. Both knew that Christianity was quite a problem, but not the problem to be solved (that’s why they focused on Jewry).
There are no longer any German National Socialists who can speak publicly, due to the draconian laws of Germany and Austria. But in previous years, I posed a question to American white nationalists, who have their First Amendment rights, which they never answered: If Jewry is the primary cause of white decline, why did the Spanish ruin their DNA by marrying Amerind women when the anti-Semitic Inquisition reigned in New Spain (what we now call Mexico)?
I think they didn’t respond because they don’t have a coherent answer to my argument: that New Spain’s Catholicism—not the Jews who had no real power in New Spain—was the obvious cause of mestizaje (racial mixing).
Juan Miguel Zunzunegui, who was born in the same city as me, is a Mexican writer and lecturer known for his Hispanist approach to Mexican history. Throughout his career, he has published several literary works and historical essays in which he attempts to debunk the Black Legend that has been used against Spain.
Zunzunegui recently published a book about Hernán Cortés, the conqueror of the Aztec Empire, whom he admires. I would like to use this short video in Spanish from YouTube to illustrate my point. The translation and transcription of the audio to text are mine. Zunzunegui said:
It’s quite nice when Cortés advances and signs pacts—for example, in the area that is now the state of Tabasco, where he meets the woman we now call Malinche, “Doña Marina”—Cortés is given twenty women, and they are not spoils of war.
That’s very important to clarify. From then on, it’s always the same: “We give you these women so that you may have children with them and we may be brothers” [i.e., Amerinds and Spaniards—Ed.]. What does Cortés do? He baptises them, gives them Spanish names, and marries them off to his men! And they have children with them. Where is the conquest there? Or at least it’s a different kind of conquest, right?
And when he allies himself with the Tlaxcallans—Spain’s great alliance in America—it’s the same thing, right?: “Take the daughters of the nobles so that you may have children with them and we may be brothers.” And that goes hand in hand with one of the last wishes expressed by Queen Isabella I of Castile shortly before her death in 1503: “Let Spaniards marry Indian women! Let Spanish women marry Indian men, and let us be one people!”
When you marry someone from another people and have a mestizo child, there are no longer two peoples. When Cortés and Doña Marina had their first mestizo child—note: Martín Cortés Malintzin had a Nahuatl surname—like Pedro de Alvarado, who married María Luisa Xicoténcatl, their children would bear the name Xicoténcatl. So, of course, Pedro de Alvarado’s son, one of the most savage men who came with Cortés, was married to the woman who would be called María Luisa Xicoténcatl, the daughter of the Tlaxcallan lord.
Look, the Tlaxcallans weren’t just conquered, they were also conquerors: they also took Tenochtitlan, and together they had a son. What was that son? Was he conquered or a conqueror? That’s irrelevant now. Those concepts dissolved as soon as we had children. Well, Hernán Cortés had a daughter with Moctezuma’s daughter, that is, Leonor Cortés y Moctezuma: Cortés’ daughter, granddaughter of Moctezuma. Was she conquered or a conqueror, considering that her descendants are grandees of Spain and live in Spain today?
What we have here is a migratory process, because, mind you: in three hundred years of Spanish rule in America, throughout all of America—well, all of Iberian America, from California to Patagonia; that is, from California to Argentina—, in three hundred years only 150,000 Spaniards arrived.
Unlike Jared Taylor, Zunzunegui knows nothing about the difference in IQ between the various races. But that’s not the point. What I want to get at is obvious: the cause of miscegenation throughout the part of the American continent conquered by Spaniards and Portuguese—the latter also had an Inquisition—wasn’t due to Jewish subversion but to Christian universalism.